reviewsearch-skill
Health Pass
- License — License: NOASSERTION
- Description — Repository has a description
- Active repo — Last push 0 days ago
- Community trust — 17 GitHub stars
Code Pass
- Code scan — Scanned 6 files during light audit, no dangerous patterns found
Permissions Pass
- Permissions — No dangerous permissions requested
No AI report is available for this listing yet.
Draft grounded rebuttals to your paper's reviews, with the experiments actually run in your workspace
reviewsearch-skill
Search real peer reviews — and the rebuttals that answered them.
Search 205,988 real peer reviews and their author rebuttals · ICLR · ICML · NeurIPS · COLM
reviewsearch-skill gives your coding agent a search engine over 205,988 real peer reviews and
their author rebuttals — every ICLR / ICML / NeurIPS / COLM paper with a public author response. Ask how
a kind of paper gets criticized, find the reviewers who raised a specific concern, and read how the
authors who answered it phrased their reply.
It's also live in your browser.
🔍 What it searches
The query is a concern, not a keyword — e.g. "reviewers asking for a statistical significance test"
or "papers criticized for weak baselines" — and each result is a real review that raised it, carrying
the author's full rebuttal as its payload.
python skills/reviewsearch/scripts/search_reviews.py \
"reviews asking for a statistical significance test" --top-k 5 --accepted-only
Each result has venue, year, title, decision, summary, concern (the reviewer's weaknesses +
questions), rebuttal (the author's response — every result has one), and a relevance score. Filter
with --accepted-only, --year-min, --year-max (the corpus spans 2023–2026).
😎 Why it's different
We did not prompt a model to imagine what reviewers say. We collected every ICLR / ICML / NeurIPS /
COLM review that has an author response, and trained our own hybrid retriever on them: a fine-tuned
dense encoder and a
sparse encoder, fused with Reciprocal Rank
Fusion (RRF), and served on a free CPU tier.
So when you ask how a concern was answered, you get the case where a real author faced the same
criticism — and their whole response, not a plausible-sounding guess.
The search engine is live: try it on the website.
📦 Installation
Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add yjoonjang/reviewsearch-skill
/plugin install reviewsearch
Codex
Tell Codex:
Fetch and follow instructions from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yjoonjang/reviewsearch-skill/main/.codex/INSTALL.md
Then just ask, for example: "find reviews asking for a significance test on a retrieval paper."
📚 Attribution
Review data from OpenReview (ICLR / ICML / NeurIPS / COLM), licensed
CC-BY-4.0.
📄 License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Reviews (0)
Sign in to leave a review.
Leave a reviewNo results found